An officer’s first job is to watch the moving car to note any initial cues of a
If the officer has a “reasonable articulable suspicion” that the driver is impaired, he
At this point, the officer is not required to arrest the driver for a DWI based initial observation. Instead, the officer should try to gather all evidence that may suggest a DWI.
For
• unusual driving actions
• weaving within a lane,
• moving at normal speed,
• evidence that the driver is drinking while driving.
Based on these initial observations of the officer must decide whether there is “reasonable articulable suspicion” to stop the vehicle.
At this point three choices:
• stop the vehicle,
• continue to observe the vehicle,
• or disregard the vehicle.
A top DWI lawyer will examine the Phase I carefully to figure out whether the police officer jumped to a conclusion without forming articulable suspicion.”
“Reasonable articulable suspicion” (RAS) or “reasonable suspicion” has a specific legal meaning. It is a requires the officer to development enough specific facts so that a reasonable officer in the officer’s had suspicion to believe a crime was afoot.
An officer can’t simply say that he had a the driver was committing a DWI. The officer must give specific facts that caused him to suspicion that driver was committing a DWI.